1860-1877 Revolution Due to Social Developments - 1383 Words

Throughout American history, many have worked to make constitutional and social equality for all Americans, slave and free, black and white. Between 1860 and 1877, America had gone through civil war and reconstruction, from destructive to constructive. Hence, there had been many factors that attributed to constitutional and social developments in America history, but the main reasons for the change could attribute to the economic rivalry between the industrial North and the agricultural South and the pivotal gap concerning slavery and the political reconstruction. The United States experienced a great period of constitutional developments from 1860 to 1877 due to the civil war, Emancipation Proclamation, three†¦show more content†¦Congress decided to bypass Johnson and build civil rights into the Constitution. (History Textbook, P431) In June 1866, Congress passed the Fourteenth Amendment granted blacks citizenship; then in February 1869, the Fifteenth Amendment gave black men the right to vote. Ultimately, the push to secure rights for African Americans were the most significant part of Reconstruction. For the first time in the US history, African Americans were given the right to vote. African American voice for equal rights was finally being heard. â€Å"If we are called on to do military duty against the rebel armies in the field, why should we be denied the privilege of voting against rebel citizens at the ballot-box.† (Document C, 1-2) This was a furious voice by an angry African American. Nevertheless, after the amendments, Document G shows African Americans voting with satisfaction. Ultimately, the push to secure rights for African Americans was the most significant part of Reconstruction, and the abolish of the slavery system even more important to American civilization. The emancipation was only a start of physical freedom. Nevertheless, true freedom would come only with economic independence, the ability to get ahead through hard work. As on Document E, African American started writing to the president,† We want Homesteads; we were promised Homesteads by the government. If it does notShow MoreRelatedEssay on Social and Constitutional Development in America (1860-1877)748 Words   |  3 PagesJanuary 13, 2011 1996 DBQ: Social and Constitutional Development in America (1860-1877) During the post-civil war era, America, specifically the south, was undergoing a period of reconstruction. The general goal of reconstruction was to successfully readmit the former Confederacy back into the Union as smoothly as possible, as well as enacting specific safeguards of freedmen’s liberties. The social and constitutional developments in America between 1860 and 1877 were very minor. The lackRead MoreCivil War Reconstruction Dbq Essay940 Words   |  4 Pagesperiod of 1860 and 1877 many major changes occurred. From the beginning of the civil war to the fall of the reconstruction, the United States changed dramatically. Nearly one hundred years after the Declaration of Independence which declared all men equal, many social and constitutional alterations were necessary to protect the rights of all people, no matter their race. These social and constitutional developments that were made during 1860 to 1877 were so drastic it could be called a revolution. Read MoreThe Shaping Of Our Country1092 Words   |  5 PagesThe shaping of our country has been impacted by several different factors, each contributing to it in their own way. Four of the major pivot points that occurred consists of: Jeffersonian democracy, Jacksonian democracy, Civil War/Reconstruction, Revolution/Constitution. However one of them happened to be the most impacting which was the Civil War and Reconstruction. The American Civil War occurred during 1861 to 1865, lasting only five years. America’s bloodiest clash resulting in the death of approximatelyRead MoreThe Struggle Of The Civil War919 Words   |  4 PagesThe Civil War lasted for only four years, from 1861-1865, but it led to many economic, political, and social developments that remained for far longer than the fighting. From 1860-1877, for example, many impactful events happened leading to the start and end of the war and into the rebuilding that was necessary after the fighting left behind devastation. In 1861, Fort Sumter was fired upon, and the north was angered into action causing Lincoln to call for soldiers to come and fight the south. AlongRead MoreFollowing Lincolns death (?), Radical Republicans took control of Congress and attempted to create600 Words   |  3 Pagesdeath (?), Radical Republicans took control of Congress and attempted to create a social and constitutional revolution. To do so, they amended the Constitution and imposed the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments. Although the purpose of these amendments was to create black equality, the South resisted acceptance of these changes so that this could not be possible. In turn, there really were not any social developments even though the constitution had been changed. Lincoln was a moderate RepublicanRead MoreThe Emergence And Development Of Russia s Radical During The Post Reform Era2688 Words   |  11 PagesFrank Masi History 127B How would you explain the emergence and development of Russia’s radical intelligentsia during the post-reform era? What were the major ideological positions and differences? Why were these positions believed to be the only possible paths to significant political change? The emergence of the intelligentsia can be heavily attributed to a general feeling of unease towards the future of the Russian Empire, which is examined by David Saunders in his book entitled â€Å"Russia in theRead MoreGerman Immigration And The Development Of The Beer Industry1291 Words   |  6 PagesGerman Immigration and the development of the Beer Industry in America Many Germany’s immigrated to the United States in 1840. Repression initiated the emigration, due to the political unrest and the failed revolution of 1848, economic distress and political aggression forced many to flee Germany. Many that fled were young, educated or skilled from well to do families seeking political freedom, opportunity, land, and the wealth that the United States offered. The largest locations of GermanRead MoreWilliam Morris: His Philosophy and Working Practices2932 Words   |  12 PagesIntroduction This essay is going to look at the life of William Morris and his working practices by analyzing his writing and historical and social background, and discuss to what extent Morris’s actual practices reflected his views on social and artistic reform. William Morris and the Victorian Britain William Morris is one of the most famous British designers of the 19th century. Although his reputation today relies on his textile designs and decorative arts business, he was actually far moreRead MoreFrom 1600 to 1877, What Major Events and/or Movements Contributed to the Creation of a Unique American Identity and/or Culture?2982 Words   |  12 Pagesto 1877, what major events and/or movements contributed to the creation of a unique American identity and/or culture? The American history can be seen as an example of progress, is awesome in every way, as you can see that it took various steps, which was marked by difficulties and major incidents. Consider also that not only was marked by errors, but also by great victories, important in the progress of the nation. The history of the United States contains many stages from 1600 to 1877 likeRead MoreEconomics of the Late Victorian Era Essay2165 Words   |  9 PagesEconomics of the Late Victorian Era With the power of wealth and concentration of industry, the tremendous development in machinery, and power to drive machinery; with the improvement of the tools of labor, so that they are wonderfully tremendous machines, and with these all on the one hand; with labor, the workers, performing a given part of the whole product, probably an infinitesimal part, doing the thing a thousand or thousands of times over and over again in a day-labor divided and subdivided

We Have a Right to Die With Dignity - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 8 Words: 2351 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/06/24 Category Law Essay Level High school Tags: Assisted Suicide Essay Did you like this example? A very controversial topic discussed in recent years is physician assisted suicide. The discussion is if it the patient actually has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Many of the people who oppose physician assisted suicide have arguments based off of religious, moral, and ethical standards. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "We Have a Right to Die With Dignity" essay for you Create order Those who support physician assisted suicide have beliefs that it ends suffering of those who are already dying and they respect ones choice of death. Even physicians are split on this topic, they argue what is the difference between killing and assisted suicide. Physician Assisted suicide is the voluntary termination of ones own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct assistance of a physician. Physician-assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. For me the main concern with assisted suicide lies with the capability of the terminally ill. Many who are in their last stages of life have begged for a physicians help to end their life. These people who are literally begging to be killed are in suffering a great deal and they believe the only way to end their pain is to kill themselves. When some view this belief some see it in a positive manner and the others see it in a negative manner. For the positives they see it as ending ones suffering, from a diseases or condition without pain. For the negatives, however, assisted suicide is the direct murder of someone. After researching both sides of the topic, I believe that terminally ill patients with the mental capacity to understand what they are doing should be given the right to physician assisted suicide. I believe this because assisted suicide gives terminally ill patients the chance to end their suffering when they want, have a better quality of life, supports free will, is accepted by ethical beliefs and has some benefits. Terminally ill patients are going to end up dying. We have machines that will pump your heart for you and continue to circulate your blood but, as far as technology has come today, no technology will end up saving the terminally ill. No technology will be able save them from the pain they go through and nothing will help relieve the immense amount of pain that these patients experience. As the days go the technology/medicine that is keeping them alive becomes a nuisance. The terminally ill patients lives become worsened and they may even start losing their mental capacity. What type of world is it to live in where everyday another piece of you goes and you get closer to death. Many terminally ill patients dont want to live in a world where they are not able to be themselves and ask their physicians to help end their suffering. Many would rather dictate their terms of when and how they go. They would rather be remembered for someone they were than someone they may become. They rather die being self reliant than dependent on someone else. We should respect their choice and this procedure should be just like any other, one self decides. For example, Charlie and Francie Emerick who suffered from prostate cancer, parkinsons, and heart attacks went through immense amount of pain and asked their physician to end their lives. They were given the euthanasia and passed away together holding hands. Their wish was fulfilled and they dictated the terms of their death and when to end their suffering. Another example is David Goodall, he was 104 and experiencing a number amount of disorders, he was in much pain and on his birthday said he was not happy to be alive. He had to travel to the Netherlands to end his life. He played the music he enjoyed, ate his favorite food, went sightseeing, and was surrounded by the ones who loved him the most. Again his mental and physical being were deteriorating and he dictated when and how he wanted to go. Why should we be able to decide ho w someone wants to live or die. Stephen Hawking stated We dont let animals suffer, so why humans?. If they are in so much pain that they would rather die, we should listen and help these people end their suffering. There are many times where technology is not enough and the pain is too much to handle. Without physician assisted suicide we are just prolonging the suffering of a terminally ill patient and these are one of the reasons physician assisted suicide for the terminally ill must be legalized. As mentioned before the quality of life is very important in this debate about physician assisted suicide. Many of the people who would and do request assisted suicide have a disorder which will make them someone who they are not. They will not be able to act the same or understand what is happening to them. They will lose all mental functions and will be suffering without understanding. This would be just as bad as any physical pain. Michelangelo once said one points with the brain not the hand. This shows that the brain is the most important thing in the body and with an ill fit brain it is hard to live. Brittany Maynard a patient with stage four Glioblastoma multiforme said Ive discussed with many experts how I would die from it, and its a terrible, terrible way to die. Being able to choose to go with dignity is my greatest hope. This statement shows the thought process of many terminally ill patients. They would rather be remembered and go as who they are than someone they might become. Many do not want to be remembered as those who went through a great deal of suffering and were not themselves but remembered as someone who had dignity. Many terminally ill patients who request assisted suicide lost hope that they will ever be able to recover from their illness, and what type of world is it to live in without having something to look forward too. Without hope the brain will become depressed and the patients state of mind will deteriorate. Many terminally ill lose their hope to live and consider themselves useless and burdensomes. No person should ever get to this point and should be give the option leaves this world before it comes to that point. Also many terminally ill patients become recipients of anxiety, from the expensive fees and regret from the family taking care of them. A competent terminally ill patient understands that all of the costs for the hospital will fall on their family and this makes them sad and depressed. According to healthline.org a month at the hospital ranges anywhere from 2,000-10,000 dollars. Many families do not have the funds to cover this cost and will be sent into financial ruin. This cost not only creates anxiety for the terminally ill but also ruins the quality of life for the terminally ill family. If the terminally ill had the option of physician assisted suicide they can help guarantee a better quality of life for them and their family. The right to assisted suicide is also part of our basic rights. Every American has the individual right to make decisions about their own life. When one who is terminally ill, fully understands what they are doing and asks the doctor to help them with suicide the doctor should support them. This is supported by the American Constitution: No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property . Every person that is a citizen of America has the right of free will provided by the constitution. The right to free will includes the right to physician assisted suicide. We are the controllers of our own destiny and fate, and the right to physician assisted suicide allows us to be the full controllers of life. Just to have the option would make people feel better. This is proven by surveys taken in Oregon, one of the few states in America to have physician a ssisted suicide legal. Just the option of assisted suicide makes people feel like they can take every possible route and take time to decide what they really want. Allowing patients the ability to choose physician assisted suicide is shown in a widely set of common ethical principles. The first ethical principle allowing people the right to physician assisted suicide, is respect of autonomy and self-determination. This principle compels us to respect the right of individuals to make their own decisions about their own lives, even their decision on death. The second ethical principle is compassion for our fellow citizens. Patients which are terminally ill will endure an immense amount of pain both mental and physical. The pain the patients experience is unnecessary and can be prevented with physician assisted suicide. Henceforth, making these patients, our fellow citizens, go through this unnecessary suffering is cruel not compassionate. The right to assisted suicide also does not just help the terminally ill patient but can also help many others. It helps the patient leave their problems. Assisted suicide helps the family recover from a tragedy and continue moving on with society. The family will be allowed to say their goodbyes and a not have to see their loved one be in pain. For example, David Goodall, the 104 year old, was in much pain, but before he preformed assisted suicide, he said goodbye to all his family and friends. In the operation room he was surrounded by his immediate family and this in a sort of way is closure for the family. They got to say what they wanted and saw him in his last moments in the world. The procedure of physician assisted suicide may also help complete strangers. For example, there was a 44 year old woman whose brain stem was damaged, she was completely paralyzed and could only communicate by blinking. She was living off machines. She determined this was no way for her to live and a sked for physician assisted suicide. She also made a request before she died and that was for her organs be donated after she passed away. Her request was fulfilled and both her kidneys and liver were harvested and donated to people in need. Today three people lives were changed because of her choice to end her meaningless life and donate her organs. The possibilities could be endless to how many other people lifes could be changed by terminally ill patients ending their life. Organs can be donated to save other peoples lives and allows the family of the terminally ill to say their final goodbyes and closure. People who oppose physician assisted suicide believe the terminally ill do not have the right to end their suffering, have a right to free will, and have a better quality of life. One of the large components to the opposition is that it is not the physicians job to end someones life that physicians are supposed to heal not kill. In contrast to this point, physicians are already familiar with facilitating the death of their patients. Currently all 50 states of America have the right to refuse treatment and be allowed to die. Also all American citizens have the right to be taken off of life support. The only difference between this and assisted suicide is that the patients may go through immense amount of pain by refusing treatment. Another counter to assisted suicide is that it goes against the hippocratic oath. The hippocratic oath is a 2,400 year old document and is it really appropriate standard of evaluation. Modern medicine and technology have already violated the oath by perform ing surgery. The hippocratic oath states one should never cut for stone and to use the knife on a patient. This part of the 2,400 year old oath is completely violated by todays medical procedures, but these medical procedures, such as surgery are required to help the suffering of the patients. Also Dr. Michael J. Strauss states Though many people assume that the oath is still taken, it is rarely administered in its original form, if at all showing the hippocratic oath is not even used in todays medicine. Dr. Robert Olvera also explains The oath also directs physicians, including me, to help the sick. So a modern interpretation of the oath might be: Do what is right for the patient. The inconsistency provided by the hippocratic oath are one of the reason why we can not use the 2,400 year old document to deny the right of assisted suicide to terminally ill patients. Another argument made by the opposers is that physician assisted suicide will lead to a slippery slope. Slippery slope i s by permitting doctors to help certain patients end their lives, members of some groups may die in disproportionately large numbers and may lead to discrimination in the hospital. After analyzing the data in places where assisted suicide is legal the University of Utah found no real evidence of disproportionate cases of physician assisted suicide. Some argue that assisted suicide is the same as murder but the difference between assisted suicide and murder is that murder deprives the victim of meaningful life that they would have experienced, but physician assisted suicide is only used when the patients future holds nothing but additional suffering. Most of the counter arguments presented by the opposite side can be proven wrong or discredited, giving us more of a reason to support physician assisted suicide. In conclusion, I believe that terminally ill patients with the mental capacity to understand what they are doing should be given the right to physician assisted suicide. I believe this because assisted suicide gives terminally ill patients the chance to end their suffering when they want, have a better quality of life, supports free will, is accepted by ethical beliefs and has some benefits. As said by Socrates, Death may be the greatest of all human blessings.

Machiavelli Realism over Idealism Free Essays

Luke Pelagio Due 5/27/2011 Period 4 Machiavelli: Realism Over Idealism Nicolo Machiavelli is known as being an archetypical realist; in other words, he was someone who originated the idea that we should not try to figure out how people should be, but rather accept and deal with the world as it literally is. Unlike Machiavelli, Plato posited an idealist view of a philosopher king reigning through virtue. To Machiavelli, this is an extremely dangerous delusion for it ignores what he considers the reality of the human condition: humans are brutal, selfish, and fickle (Machiavelli and Power Politics). We will write a custom essay sample on Machiavelli: Realism over Idealism or any similar topic only for you Order Now You don’t need a philosopher king to secure off enemies and reinforce order/stability; on the other hand, you need a prince or a leader who understands what it takes to lead. It is better to be feared than loved if you can’t be both. â€Å"Nevertheless a prince ought to inspire fear in such a way that, if he does not win love, he avoids hated; because he can endure very well being feared whilst he not hated, which will always be as long as he abstains from the property of his citizens and subjects and from their women,† (Machiavelli, The Prince). Machiavelli applied force to get what he wanted, but he always kept his hands off the property of others. This is because men more quickly forget the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony (Machiavelli, The prince). In The Prince, Machiavelli demonstrates how to obtain and keep political power. This is what he did using witty tactics. 1 A prince must always pay diligent attention to military circumstances if he wants to reside in power, so the most desirable and beneficial type of army are native troops, composed of one’s own citizens or subjects. The prince has many characteristics that are crucial to his standing in a society such as: it is better to be stingy than generous, it is better to be cruel than merciful, it is better to break promises if keeping them would be against one’s interests, and princes should choose wise advisors rather than flatterers. All these attributes are key to how well a Prince thrives (Public Bookshelf, The Prince). A prince must learn not to be limited to morality when unavoidable; a leader has to be able to use lies, force and deception if required in the world. Whether it is better to be feared or loved clearly addresses the reason for this. You can’t trust people, for they will turn on you. It is inevitable. Human nature means that doing what you must do at all costs according to any moral code simply puts you at a disadvantage. In addition, humans are generally under agreement to throw out such moral concerns if it is to their advantage. â€Å"Men have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails,† (Machiavelli, The Prince). This quote perfectly demonstrates Machiavellian realism. First, it is a very opposing and adverse view on human nature. Second, it is realistic and logical. If, by any chance, you are a prince or a leader, and you do not understand the atrocious inherent in 2 men, you will fail. Those who are most ruthless will have power; this is just reality. â€Å"For my part I consider that it is better to be adventurous than cautious, because fortune is a woman, and if you wish to keep her under it is necessary to beat and ill-use her; and it is seen that she allows herself to be mastered by the adventurous rather than by those who go to work more coldly. She is, therefore, always, woman-like, a lover of young men, because they are less cautious, more violent, and with more audacity command her,† (Machiavelli, The Prince). Machiavelli politics is definitely aimed toward the masculine side. It is power and control, so fortune is feminine and more anarchy. If not under control, it will be unstable and chaotic. His influence stretches far beyond Italy in the sixteenth century and lies with us today in how we think/understand the world of international relations. Everything I have read such as: ideas about Plato, Aristotle, Thomas Hobbes, and Nicolo Machiavelli are all extremely important to my knowledge and insight about political concepts/background. I believe that to be educated one must have familiar knowledge with those who have shaped today’s political society and government. Machiavelli’s ideas, in particular, are used everywhere today. One who has not been informed of Nicolo Machiavelli would be living in ignorance, for that individual would be clueless of how ideas today became what they are/how they are. When President Nixon organized the Watergate Scandal in 1973, the public had 3 no inclination that their leader was capable of such corrupt and unscrupulous means. Nixon, under the impression that his campaign was vulnerable, manipulated for power in the only way he saw fitting, hoodwinking. Take a look at President Truman; he dropped a bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki reaching casualties of 120,000. According to him, survival of the United States was so admonished that the use of such insignificant means was necessary. Even President Obama has his faults. The ideas of hope were what we, the people, needed to hear. It would allow us to be optimistic, and contain a false sense of protection thinking that everything would work out. Barak Obama made many promises; he said everything that we would ever want to hear. However, none of his promises have come true. Maybe in extremely insufficient ways we are approaching the goals of what he promised. This is barely noticeable though. In conclusion, the tactics and ideas formed and created by Nicolo Machiavelli are ingenious. President Obama noticed that Machiavelli’s ideas â€Å"work,† and he used them to his advantage to help him become the President of the United States of America. Lastly, I don’t think that I could live in a Machiavellian-ruled/based society. While the Prince or ruler thrives, the people are lied to and don’t have very much value. One thing is absolute, though: Machiavelli’s ideas can’t be ignored or discarded simply because we do not wish them to be true. We must accept the reality of everything, and do something positive for our country. 4 How to cite Machiavelli: Realism over Idealism, Essay examples

Essay On Sigmund Freud Example For Students

Essay On Sigmund Freud Sigmund Freuds LifePsychoanalysis, method of treating mental illness, was Sigmund Freuds most recognized work. In 1938, Freud was eighty-two years old and was forced to flee to London because he was Jewish. He died the following year with many accomplishments and went through plenty of hardships in his life time. Thats why Sigmund Freud has influenced American politically, socially, and ideology because he changed the countrys perception on how people think, dream, and the things they do. Sigmund Freud was born on May 6th, 1856 in Frieberg, Moravia. Which is present day Czech Republic. Sigmund Freud was the son of Jacob and Amalia Freud. Sigmunds family was Jewish, the population of Frieberg was one hundred and thirty Jews, out of four thousand and five hundred ,and the rest were Catholic. During this time period Jewish people had to move to different countries because they were persecuted or had legal restrictions, banishments or slaughtered. Thats when the Freuds moved to Tysmenite. This was popular for Jews and it was the center to Jewish learning and scholarships. Sigmund had two half brothers from his fathers first marriage. Then Sigmund Freuds parents had another son and named after Amalia brother. The baby died the same way her brother did. After that she zoned away and didnt take care of Sigmund. They hired a maid to take care of things. A couple years later, Jacob and Amalia started to have kids again. They had five daughters and another son. Little bit after that Sigmunds fathers business collapsed and things started to fall downhill for the family. Sigmund Freud did outstanding in school, he received his medical degree from University in 1881. Before he became interested in the medical field, he wanted to study natural science and to solve challenging problems concerning scientists. Sigmund Freud was influenced by many people. Right after Sigmund finished school, he changed his career to a psychiatrists. Between 1885 and 1886 he went to work in a clinic in Paris with Jean Charcot. Then later in 1886 opened a private practice in Vienna. He devoted half an hour everyday to self-analysis. His psychiatric expanded when he became a professor at Vienna University. Sigmunds first book was published in 1895, Studies in Hysteria, the co-author was Josef Breur. The next ten years of Sigmunds life he was working with Josef Breur. In 1908, was the first international Psychoanalytic Congress developed. Sigmund was the president and the meetings we re held at Salzburg. Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts wanted Sigmund Freud to come and get lectures to classes in 1909. Freud has published one hundred and fifty books and five journals in twenty years of his life. In 1930, Sigmund Freud won Goethe Prize for excellence in Prose style. Sigmund Freuds book Interpretation of Dreams was published in 1900 and it was the most known out of all his books. This book enhanced his reputation. Wilhelm Stekel, general medical practitioner, wrote a favorable review in Viennese Newspaper in 1902 about Interpretation of Dreams. Between all this Sigmund Freud got married had six kids and developed cancer in his jaw. He had thirty different operations before he died. We will write a custom essay on On Sigmund Freud specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Even though a lot of people thought that Sigmund Freud came up with some wacky thoughts, some of them were actually decent. For example, saying dreams reveal something important about the dreamer. Also, people in the early 1900s thought that dreams didnt mean anything but refused notions. Sigmund proved that dreams are personal and purposeful. Sources are also found in childhood repressed experiences. These could be traced to unsolved conflicts from children problematic relations with parents. Psychoanalysis is conceiving the conscious coping/adapting part of the mind with another part. Sigmund believes that the mind is a battlefield between past/present, impulse/ inhibition, and the unconscious/ consciousness. Also the cure for mental illness was to cover the unconscious to light. .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde , .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde .postImageUrl , .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde , .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde:hover , .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde:visited , .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde:active { border:0!important; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde:active , .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u949bc5d55504062f38beaa224e7eefde:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The baroque has been called a theatrical style, on EssaySigmund Freud has made a big difference in psyche. He advanced the study of the mind and how it works. It made people aware of how influential our relationships with others are. He destroyed the rigid divisions between sick/healthy, conscious/unconscious, will/accident, psychology/psychiatry, and philosophy/medicine. What Sigmund Freud thought just didnt effect the medicine profession, it effected everything around also. The medical professions grew larger because of him. He changed the way society thought about and dealt with mental illness. People had a thin line between insane and sane and he changed that. His bigg est influence was Jean-Martin Charcot. People thought mental illness was organic. Mental Illness affected a large proportion of the population. He made the line between insane and sane blurred. Anyone can have a mental illness because of inner conflicts and childhood traumas. Psychoanalysis impacted the practice of psychiatry by medical, academic, and governmental sources. People saw a new way of thinking about why people act the way they do. He showed a new way of interpreting behaviors, motives, desires, and beliefs buried in unconscious that controlled and motivated their conscious thoughts and behavior. Sigmund Freud shaped the 20th century cultural production. He changed writers and artists work because of the brain. Back in the day the only thing that society was concerned about was perfection. If one person was different from everyone else, they would be seen as an outcast to society as if something was wrong with them. Sigmund Freud changed that with all the research and stu dies he did in different fields with different doctors.